Performance Evaluation of the Brazilian Health System in 215 Discourses: Comparative Simplifications and Control Weaknesses

The aim of this study was to analyze the form and content collective opinion stakeholders on Performance Index Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). A quanti-qualitative methodology used, whose capturing speeches made electronic sites, portals blogs that dealt with subject. Discourse Collective Subject method used for processing 215 into fourteen central ideas. most frequent “undue comparisons” 23.04% (50); “good evaluation” system, 13.36% (29); “criticism method/index” 11.52% (25). We perceive in performance there a majority pole simplifies extremely complex processes, making evaluation shallow. Another, minority, seeks retrain debate by recovering production knowledge completeness work processes. Thus, we can affirm control civil society regarding health system seems fragile.